Multi-Criteria Fuzzy AHP Method for Analyzing the Importance of E-Learning Platforms during Covid-19

Authors

  • Veeramanickam M. R. M.
  • Sergey Gorbachev
  • Pavan Kumar Vadrevu
  • Dmytro Shevchuk
  • Amevi Acakpovi
  • Robert Awuah-Baffour

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57118/creosar/978-1-915740-01-4_11

Keywords:

Covid-19, HMCDM, E-learning, analytic hierarchy process, analytic network process, Decision Making System

Abstract

The demand for e-learning has risen to new heights due to uncertainty during the Covid19 pandemic. Every organization try to find better ways of communication with their stakeholders and therefore most of the applications used widely during covid19 pandemic include virtual conferencing tools. However, the effectiveness of virtual conferencing tools, especially those used for teaching and learning purposes, needs to be assessed critically. As a standard practice, it is always useful to consider multiple inputs in decision making especially when there is a need to achieve optimal results. In this regard e-learning platform impacts have been analyzed in this paper with published research articles which are indexed in the Scopus database. The datasets include a lot of information including authors' nativity, journal information, date of publication, abstract of the research article etc. In line with this perspective, this paper considers the application of hybrid multi-criteria decision making for fuzzy logical analysis with analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the possibility of analytic network process (ANP) to assist decision-making in assessing and choosing priority for high impact e-learning platform. This multi-criteria  model can assist decision-making in assessing and choosing priority for high impact e-learning platforms accurately and effectively by using the Fuzzy AHP method. As per AHP and F-AHP results, its important to aware of the e-learning platforms impact using publication data perspectives, the common things in both analysis is criteria C5 («Abstract») with good impact result. And also other two criterion like C1 («Title of the article») and C7 («Location-Country») have significant impact on this research article publication as per findings of Fuzzy AHP.

References

H. Zermane and S. Aitouche, “Digital Learning With Covid-19 In Algeria,” International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry, vol. 4, issue 2, pp.161-170, Aug 2020.

S. Rose, “Medical Student Education in the Time of COVID-19,” JAMA, vol. 323, issue 21, pp.2131-2132, Jun 2020.

M. Caramihai and I.Severin, “The Spatial and Temporal Properties of eLearning: an Exploratory Study Regarding the Students’ Perspective,” in Balkan Region Conference on Engineering and Business Education, Sibiu, Romania, 2019, pp.369-376.

I. Basak and T. Saaty, “Group decision making using the analytic hierarchy process,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 17, issue 4-5, pp.101-109, 1993.

J. Hummel, J. Bridges, M. IJzerman, “Group Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Benefit-Risk Assessment: A Tutorial,” The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, vol. 7, issue 2, pp.129-140, 2014.

V.Penadés-Plà, T.García-Segura, J.Martí and V.Yepes, “A Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods Applied to the Sustainable Bridge Design,” Sustainability, vol. 8, issue 12, pp.1295-1316, Dec 2016.

S.Shaikh, M.Memon, K.Kim, “A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Ideal Business Location Identification,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, issue 11, p.4983, May 2021.

J.Mueller, K.McConnell, P.Burow, K.Pofahl, A.Merdjanoff, J.Farrell, “Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on rural America,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 118, issue 1, Dec 2020.

A.Bozkurt, K.Karakaya, M.Turk, Ö.Karakaya, D.Castellanos-Reyes, “The Impact of COVID-19 on Education: A Meta-Narrative Review,” TechTrends, vol. 66, issue 5, pp.883-896, 2022.

Y. C. Raton, “Soft skills of higher education in industry 4.0 era using buckley’s fuzzy-ahp”, IJAHP, vol. 14, issue 1, Apr 2022.

G. Marcarelli and P. Mancini, “School and academic performance for ranking high schools: Some evidence from Italy,” IJAHP, vol. 14, issue 2, Jun 2022.

M.Otadi, M.Mosleh, “Solving fully fuzzy matrix equations,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 36, issue 12, pp.6114-6121, Dec 2012.

Tomas K.Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, 2nd ed. New-York: McGraw-Hill International Book Company, 1980.

Jeremy Y L Yap, Chiung Ching Ho, and Ting Choo Yee, “Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for business site selection,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 16, issue 1, p. 020151, Sep 2018.

Agung Purnomo, Fatkul Anam, Mega Firdaus, Nur Asitah, “E-Learning in COVID-19,” Dataset of E-learning Research During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020. 26-Jan-2021.

M. S. Dwi Putra, S. Andryana, Fauziah, and A. Gunaryati, “Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process method to determine the quality of gemstones,” Advances in Fuzzy Systems, vol. 2018, pp. 1–6, 2018.

T. Demirel, N. Ç. Demirel, and C. Kahraman, “Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and its application,” Springer Optimization and Its Applications, vol. 16, pp. 53–83, 2008.

E. Tolga, M. L. Demircan, and C. Kahraman, “Operating system selection using fuzzy replacement analysis and analytic hierarchy process,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 89–117, 2005.

M. S. Dwi Putra, S. Andryana, Fauziah, and A. Gunaryati, “Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process method to determine the quality of gemstones,” Advances in Fuzzy Systems, vol. 2018, pp. 1–6, 2018.

M. G. Abdel-Kader and D. Dugdale, “Evaluating investments in Advanced Manufacturing Technology: A Fuzzy set theory approach,” The British Accounting Review, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 455–489, 2001.

C.-C. Chou and K.-W. Yu, “Application of a new hybrid fuzzy AHP model to the location choice,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, pp. 1–12, 2013.

H.-Y. Wu, G.-H. Tzeng, and Y.-H. Chen, “A fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating banking performance based on Balanced Scorecard,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, issue 6, pp. 10135–10147, 2009.

J.-C. Tu and C.-L. Hu, “Applying the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to construct the product innovative service system of Wedding Photography Apparel,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2015, pp. 1–12, 2015.

P. Kaur, “Selection of vendor based on intuitionistic fuzzy analytical hierarchy process,” Advances in Operations Research, vol. 2014, pp. 1–10, 2014.

F. O. Igbinovia and J. Krupka, "Product value chain in a tertiary institution: The need for MCDM," in 2017 IEEE European Technology and Engineering Management Summit (E-TEMS), 2017, pp. 1-6.

Falak Nawaz, Mehdi Rajabi Asadabadi, Naeem Khalid Janjua, Omar Khadeer Hussain, Elizabeth Chang, Morteza Saberi, “An MCDM method for cloud service selection using a Markov chain and the best-worst method,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 159, pp. 120-131, 2018.

Aziz, Nor Filianie, Shahryar Sorooshian, and Fatimah Mahmud. "MCDM-AHP method in decision makings," ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, vol. 11, issue 11, pp. 7217-7220, 2016.

Burda, Michal. "Modeling Relationship Between Fuzzy Sets Towards Boolean Algebra of Fuzzy Sets," Fuzzy Sets and Systems, pp.1-37, March 2016.

T. L. Saaty, K. P. Kearns, and I. A. Ushakov, Analytical Planning The Organization of System, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1985.

Published

2022-11-24

How to Cite

M. R. M., V., Gorbachev, S., Vadrevu, P. K., Shevchuk, D., Acakpovi, A., & Awuah-Baffour, R. (2022). Multi-Criteria Fuzzy AHP Method for Analyzing the Importance of E-Learning Platforms during Covid-19. Artificial Intelligence Impressions, 1, 233–254. https://doi.org/10.57118/creosar/978-1-915740-01-4_11